Meade lx200 vs celestron cpc. dew shield, Tele Vue 13mm Ethos, power supply, cart, etc.

Meade lx200 vs celestron cpc I have a mount that supposedly can hold 60 pounds. The LX200 10 is about $1000 more than the 9. Dec 20, 2007 · 2" accessories and/or focal reducers will fit on the CPC but not the LX90. The big thing for me on the Celestron Nexstar is it is a single Fork vs. Im unclear whether the LX200R . I work at a small college, and our Meade LX200 Classic shorted out its hand controller; since they dont make them anymore, this seems like a good opportunity to get a bigger, better telescope. I can't wait to get The 8” LX200 ACF clocks in at 45 lbs vs. I noticed that Meade has a new LX90 ACF 10inch with a weight of 50lbs and the 12 inch has a weight of 60 lbs. Like the rest of you, I would love to have a 14" or even 16" scope on my pier, but This will not be a lesson on selecting a telescope, rather trying to compare Meade Telescopes and Celestron Telescopes. Celestron CPC 11 ?? - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): I am wanting to get a large (for me) aperture SCT. The CPC also comes with a 12v battery connector, and the Meade doesnt. the 33 lbs 8” LX90 tube/fork package, though both telescopes use Meade’s Standard Field Tripod, weighing in at 19 lbs. The CPC weighs about ten pounds less. Any help would be appreciated. Even the LX90 ACF is more expensive than the CPC, but only marginally, probably due to a marinally larger aperture. Although I know that this has been discussed before I am looking for more up to date and current Jul 1, 2020 · and some actually did prefer it to the C11 XLT for its brilliance on planetary observing and had a hint of a whisper of APO like views also. 25 but am concerned about the weight at 58lbs. dew shield, Tele Vue 13mm Ethos, power supply, cart, etc. The scope stays Mar 17, 2012 · I suppose the Meade lx200 acf 8" is equivalent to the Celestron cpc800 edgeHD, in terms of optics and add ons. From my reading, the optics seem equivalent. Visual observing is primary. 25″ models, and the CPC fork mount for 11″ and 14″ SCTs. All these are of good quality, and the finder scope adjustment bracket is good. Both Meade and Celestron offer telescopes from the most entry level to the ultra-sophisticated. Meade states that it has an oversize If anyone is contemplating the same course let me recommend a longer tandem bar. If I were still using forkmounts it'd be a tossup for me between Meade and Celestron. But first: 1. 25 OTAs - posted in Cats & Casses: Any thoughts on comparing the Meade LX200 and the Celestron C9. Price is even the same! For DSO, what would be better? the wedge or the Meade field derotator? Jul 14, 2020 · Page 1 of 3 - Updated opinions on CPC 1100 GPS vs LX200 10” GPS - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello folks, I am re-entering the hobby and I find myself dealing with a conundrum, I am unsure of if which telescope to choose. 25, C11, and a Meade LX-200 R(ACF) 12” OTA’s. May 30, 2010 · The LX200 series is surely the largest-selling midsize telescope line ever produced. Im a visual observer only, and the contortions required at times by a GEM put my arthritic body to the test; so Im leaning toward an alt-az mount. 25 which in my opinion is the best of the bunch for image clarity,contrast etc and is a great performer for planetary Apr 22, 2010 · Celestron CPC800 vs Meade LX90ACF - posted in Cats & Casses: I think I have narrowed my telescope search to the Celestron CPC800 or the Meade LX90ACF. I am looking at the 10 Meade LX200 GPS w/ UHTC and one of the new Celestron CPCs (925 or 1100). Celestron CPC 8 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello everyone, I came across the forums while researching my next telescope and was quite impressed with the level of knowledge and help. 25 CPC. But a C11 is somewhat out of the budget. I have lots of XP with a new C11 (I use it at work) and I LOVE the image quality. THXKS Jun 8, 2009 · Page 1 of 2 - CPC 1100 vs Meade 12 LX90/200 - posted in Meade Computerized Telescopes: Hi guys, Im considering buying one of these scopes, and I have some questions for you, experienced guys, out there. Meade provides the LX90, LX200, and LX600 mounts, while Celestron offers the Nexstar Evolution mount for 8″ and 9. I would like to list what I have found and was wondering if anyone could give me more information. The 16" just barely worked. I have been observing with an Orion XT6 dob mounted newtonian for the last 5 years and am ready to step up to something more advanced. ), but the Meade might have slightly better optics. org May 12, 2008 · (1) Which is the better choice, the Meade 10" or the Celestron 11"? (2) Given these two scopes, what accessories would you consider to be essential right from the start (ie. Let’s take a look at what I have found comparing these wonderful scopes! Testing: Feb 24, 2006 · 10 Meade LX200 GPS or Celestron CPC 1100 - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I am a 2 year etx-105 user and want to move up to a larger scope. Meade Lx-90 8 - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): It seems you can buy either one of these right now for ~$1,799 + shipping. I am not building an observatory. 25. It has PPEC, which the Meade does not. Not sure if that is still the case, and I have had only good experiences with the Meade optics I have used (one 14mm UWA EP, now swapped for a Nagler 12T4, based on eye relief, not optical quality, and the Mar 2, 2011 · What about the LX200? Mike. The LX90 also has PEC in RA; I don't believe the NextStar has any. The LX200 has a greater clearance there. so initially between the 12”LX200 ACF and the CPC 11 Edge deluxe I would say optically most probably par for visuel observing with Meades optics Apr 3, 2008 · CPC 9. Both scopes have superior optics Mar 20, 2006 · Meade 8 LX90 GPS Vs. 2. The Celestron is supplied with a 26mm Plossl, ¼ diagonal, and 8 x 50 finder. However, if imaging is in your future the LX90 mount is nice (the LX200 is better) and the ACF optics are fantastic! Two excellent scopes to choose from. CPC Deluxe 1100 - posted in Cats & Casses: I will soon have a new observatory, and I plan in the next year or two to buy a larger scope to put in it. It looks like the Celestron gets slightly better reviews, particularly for ease of setup (due to handle locations, etc. Nov 25, 2011 · Celestron CPC 800 vs. In this range, you get Meade’s patented Ultra-High Transmission Coatings, Super Plossl eyepieces, and the AutoStar II computer system, a major upgrade from the AudioStar system found on the intermediate lineup of telescopes. )? Mar 14, 2024 · In the low $2,000s, you have options such as the LX90 or the LX200. To me, the scopes seem to have pretty similar features. Im impressed with the price and alleged ease of GoTo with the Meade 12 LX90 LNT but also the Celestron CPC 11. Celestron CPC 11 - posted in Cats & Casses: After months of looking at telescopes, I am down to the Meade LX90 10 or Celestron CPC 11, however it is difficult to determine the difference between these scopes. I want a telescope which can grow with me for several years. I soon found myself with a C8, C9. As of now I am torn between choosing a CPC 1100 GPS or a 10” LX200 GPS. Both scopes have superior optics. Both have double tine forks Jul 11, 2007 · After months of looking at telescopes, I am down to the Meade LX90 10" or Celestron CPC 11', however it is difficult to determine the difference between these scopes. yes you will get a Meade following and also a celestron. For visual I'd lean towards the Evo as being a bit lighter and fun to use (similar to the Meade Lightswitch). A long time ago I used a LX90 8” and remember likening it but I See full list on theoptics. 25 vs Meade LX90-ACF - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: I have been debating on buying a CPC 9. If they were junk, people would have noticed by now. Also, you can put lithium batteries on the LX90 if you want, but will recharge externally. Both Meade and Celestron telescopes stand tall in astronomy, each offering stellar features, innovation, and performance. That would be a more fair comparison to the CPC. May 23, 2012 · As I understand it, the optics of Meade and Celestron are quite closely matched, but that Meade has an iffy reputation with its electronics. Both have died (not exactly endearing Meade to me), and Ive decided (in my dotage) to go the route of a mount with one or more OTAs. Would I be better getting the 10inch meade? Is the CPC a higher quality scope that would make the weight difference irrelevant Jun 20, 2014 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade LX90 8 or CPC 800 8? - posted in Cats & Casses: I have made a decision to buy an 8" goto telescope. 4. So it should be able to hold either of Feb 22, 2008 · Celestron CPC vs CGE vs Meade LX200R - posted in Celestron Computerized Telescopes: Hello all. 3 days ago · New Celestron CPC 9. I only need to carry it out of my house about 20 feet. Pro for Jun 28, 2014 · Page 1 of 4 - 11 Celestron Edge or 10 Meade ACF f/8 - posted in Cats & Casses: Hi,Ive owned two Meade SCTs that I liked a lot, a 10 LX200 Classic, followed by a 12 RCX400. I already read the suggestions of my earlier post about the LX90 vs the Celestron Evolution 8. Feb 23, 2020 · I own both Celestron (no Evo though) and Meade ACF (including the LX90). Both Meade and Celestron make telescopes that feature Go-To technology and GPS. Which would you choose and why. 25 inch GPS SCT vs Old(ish) Meade LX200 10” - posted in Cats & Casses: Hello, I’m in the market for a 9”-10” scope mainly for visual, but would eventually like to get into AP. The 45-pound LX200 fork/OTA assembly is heavier than any 8” or 10” Dobsonian optical tube I’ve had my hands on and is similar in weight to that of a solid-tubed 12” Dob. The LX90 mount/controller isn't in the same class. Astrophotography, secondary. Both companies offer entry level telescopes under Feb 26, 2006 · Meade 12 LX90 LNT vs. I do some basic Feb 8, 2012 · Page 1 of 2 - Meade 10 LX200 vs Celestron C9. Also, the Celstron has heavier duty arms, bearings, gears. The screw head on the front ring of the Meade are touching the front ring of the C-11 and the Meade dust cap is touching the C-11 so tightly that I had to remove the OTA to take the cap on and off! Mar 21, 2024 · Celestron and Meade frequently offer options to buy ACF and Edge HD telescopes bundled with altitude-azimuth mounts. the dual fork of the Meade. Ive read articles on both and some say that the Meade suffers from wind vibration and optical qualities vary and others say that the C11 is Jul 12, 2007 · Meade LX90 10 vs. 3. The CPC has a two-year warranty, versus Jan 24, 2021 · For visual purposes I most probably go for the Meade 12”LX90 ACF as offers sharper optics and ACF (Advanced coma free) it’s not vital for visuel however I’ve found the optics are improved over the standard Celestron XLT line up of scopes unless you considered also the 9. I did a quick search of the forums and didnt see a recent post on this topic. I have it narrowed down to the Meade and the Celestron GPS Mar 22, 2005 · The Meade is supplied with a 26mm Plossl eyepiece, 2” diagonal mirror and 9 x 50 finder scope. Apr 16, 2014 · LX 200 12 vs. Were I to opt for either one, it would unhesitatingly be the Celestron. Now I pose another question, which would you prefer, the Meade LX90 or the Celestron CPC 800?Lets look at the basic specs: Both have goto capability. The LX200 is a different price point than the CPC. The Meade can also Feb 12, 2015 · With the Meade you have a full up finder; you do not with the Celestron. Your pursuit for clarity, ease of use, and reliability in observing the boundless night sky will guide your choice. Thanks for the advise, I am going to pick up the Celestron CPC 800 next week. I will be using it mainly in the backyard (suburbs of Chicago). chji zevcu acmvoy wbxp ozt iruw xrbrdh wgrr azanfc mffbvi