Friendlywrt vs openwrt reddit r4s com/anaelorlinski/OpenWrt-NanoPi-R2S-R4S-Builds | There is a minimal version and full version and with ext4 and Squashfs versions. Also the R5C has dual 2. 5g machines at the end of both ports, so that probably hurts the results. 8gb ram ddr4 vs 2gb ram ddr4 32gb flash vs 8gb flash 1xgbe + 2x2. Nov 24, 2024 · Decompress the OpenWrt sysupgrade. It's rebranded OpenWrt 19. git/commit If it's based on the same OpenWRT major version, then you should be fine. 5 though so reasonably fresh either way. iirc, that reviewer got lower results on the r5s for some reason. It uses the same CPU as the r4s. The C7 LAN ports are "private", protected from the public internet. Also it should be closer to half the price OP mentioned on aliexpress, I certainly wouldn't buy an old R4S for £130 GBP. I've had no issues flashing different openwrt builds on their devices. 5 r20134-5f15225c1e . Reply reply I have OpenWrt on a raspberry pi 4 and a few wifi APs providing wireless coverage to the whole house, and best of all, no stupid apps to mess with. Do you use the vanilla OpenWrt 22. 5G ports and 8 Gb emmc. If you then connect the Asus WAN port to a C7 LAN port, the firewall/NAT on the I've been looking to get more into networking and OpenWRT lately and I stumbled across the R4s. If it tweaks your paranoia (and it shouldn’t - TikTok is much worse) use Openwrt once they release firmware. 0 storage and Samba4 support to have a share drive on my netwo May 30, 2020 · Over the past few weeks I have been fortunate enough to do some tests with early OpenWRT builds on the NanoPI R2S provided to me by @jayanta525. Installing packages would be the same process, if you can get a sources list for packages built for whatever kernel version you choose from the linked repo. So I was wondering if the distribution of openwrt (or friendlywrt) for these two devices is blobless too. Yes indeed, the R5S and R6S are not officially supported by OpenWrt yet though, just the R4S is. Reply reply More replies Having used pfsense/opnsense and openwrt for a decade now, I would say openwrt on x86 would be the better choice for most people. 24. Nanopi R2S vs. I suggest starting with the existing Openwrt support files for the R5S and modify the dts to match differences for the R3S. 2 key M Pas de minipcie vs avec minipcie 12gpio vs 26 gpio Almost the same price Biggest downside of R6S, runs friendlyWRT instead of stock OpenWRT The manufacturer provided image sounded marginally more polished than the openwrt one. This is a dual Gigabit Ethernet board with a 4 core Rockchip SOC (RK3328) on it, manufactured by FriendlyARM. I been wanting to buy the r5s over the r4s for the extra port, but most of the iperf3 tests i saw were running on the device itself, instead of having server and client be separate 2. 5gbe + 5x gbe avec vlan Pas wifi vs wifi6 4x4 2. For this use OpenWrt for Mikrotik RB750gr3 vs. As the R5S doesn't even receive snapshots yet I'd say FriendlyWRT is the only option for a while. 10 votes, 17 comments. Just to be safe, I blocked all the “phone home” sites from the APs. FriendlyElec has its own open source implementation of OpenWRT. gz image and write it to a micro SD card using software such as dd or Balena Etcher. Reply reply I am using the rockpro64 with blobless boot. I thought it would be ok, but I didn't realize how dumbed down the stock firmware would be. 1GB version - currently the 1GB RAM version is not bootable from snapshot. 5gbe vs 2x 2. Otherwise you are left with using FriendlyElec's fork called FriendlyWRT, unless the development build of OpenWRT has enough support in it. Processor performance should be somewhere between the r2s and r4s, and it comes with 2x 2. Features: with it being Linux based there are way more pre-built packages. Never hurts to try though. WOOO!!!! FriendlyElec NanoPi R4S OpenWrt 22. For example, I installed USB 3. . My home network runs on a R4S pretty splendidly, I need to build a new router for roadwarrior setup. Now, as I understand, the recent releases of the Raspberry Pi 4 and the NanoPi R4S have changed the game a bit for small affordable network routers. Currently I have an AR150 with official openwrt, two x750's and a Mango V2 on ROOTER (openwrt fork with expanded modem support built-in). any worse than a branded router though? Probably not. 2 vs m. Performance of the board is great, especially considering its price point (€32 incl shipping to Europe in my case). 03. 06. The only thing i don't like about it , is the the Docker CE version pre-installed is version 1. iiuc, there is a kernel driver missing in vanilla openwrt Hi guys, My main goal is to get the best bufferbloat score, I picked the Nanopi R6S as supposedly has more than enough processing power to handly my… View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. i have been running this for almost a year. So what "arguing against NanoPi" you've seen so far? At the moment NanoPi R4S is the fastest one with official OpenWrt support (I have it), the R5S/R5C is almost there (but this is actually slower than R4S, just with 2. 07 but it is 18. Screenshot of the upgraded 3. See forum post for discussion and assistance. 5gpbs ethernet vs 1gbps on the r4s. But if you're content with FriendlyWrt builds for the time being the R6S is the way to go. Does it differ in any way, and what would I lose from using it? Also, are there only community ports of OpenWRT to the R4S or is there an official ARM port by the core developers? If you are wanting to run OpenWRT, the NanoPi R4S is the only one of those two officially supported. they say 19. Currently my network looks like this: Aug 29, 2024 · There's a guide here; [OpenWrt Wiki] Adding a new device. I can't specifically speak for the ar750s but I don't think you should have much issues with it. 07 would be three years old. friendlywrt seems to just be openwrt with a bunch of packages pre installed. Unsure if I should buy another R4S for $120 considering its a year old now are there any more capable/faster single board computers that run OpenWRT with 2 NICs that I should consider? I found the differences between the R2S versions of Openwrt and FriendlyWRT minimal. I've not tried. true. FriendlyWRT often has unpatched vulnerabilities. I have an R4S and it's great on a 300/300 connection, vanilla openWRT. In summary (more Lol. 5G port), R6S is the real monster but need more time to wait for official support. org Git - openwrt/openwrt. 1 and i'm not sure how to upgrade it. Got my box in from Friendly-WRT is basically the same but specifically for the R2S and the R4S. Think of everything connected to the WAN port as public, and everything connected to a LAN port as private. 8 GPU+HDMI vs pas de video out Pas m. 3. x ? or use the fork from ImmortalWRT or FriendlyWRT? I'm testing the ones from here https://github. 216 (yesterday's snapshot) for that router. 4+5. hello, i have a 940 symmetrical fiber connection setup with a nanopi r4s and a eap610, and am getting slow speeds of around 360 mbps. img. My question is, given that this is a critical part of my home network, is there any major difference in performance or ease-of-use if I used FriendlyWRT vs OpenWRT, or something with a good desktop environment like Ubuntu / Debian (both on the official supported list), or something else? I don't think the main openwrt release works on this board yet, but friendlyelec has their own version and I believe openwrt will eventually support it. 07. ? After many years of using Tomato or Asus-Merlin firmware, I got a new TP-Link AX1500 router that doesn't support third party firmware. This version of openwrt is over 4years old, I mean, and even 19. OpenWrt for x86-64 is much improved the last couple years, it's a rock solid and fast (Linux based) alternative to pfSense (FreeBSD based). I will buy an additional SD card, Thanks for the tip, One quick question, Do you use the ext4 or squashfs when flashing openwrt image on the nanopi R4S? I don’t want to configure the Openwrt via SHH/CMD just the web interface Hi people, we're looking into replacing our current setup of a Unifi USG and four of their dumb, "expiring" APs with an OpenWrt setup. Then simply insert the SD card into the R4S, apply power, and it will boot OpenWrt. OpenWrt is definitely still being actively developed. But if it's a different version then it's the same as with a regular upgrade and it's best to start fresh or use a backup. openwrt. i initially was using the firmware on the nanopi r4s page and was getting about 850 mbps, but after trying out some of anaelorlinski's build to try out sqm and then switching back, i am getting much slower speeds. Easier to install (mount your boot drive externally, rufus the x86 image to it, put it in the pc), easier to configure antibufferbloat fixes (use luci_app_sqm, configure with layer_cake and put in your down and up speeds), way easier firewall setup. The modem (and internet at large) is on the WAN side of the C7. The R4S gets it's first stable OpenWRT release with the upcoming 22. Will probably switch over to the official one later I'm on a symetrical gigabit FTTC line. I couldn’t be happier with the setup. i got the r5s and am getting >2gbps throughput in my tests. Details of the R5S support are available in the Commit; git. What I'm having trouble figuring out is if I can use the R4s as my main router but keep my Archer A6 as the WiFi device by connecting it to the second ethernet port on the R4s and using it as an AP. Friendly is just nicely setup but nothing that an hour of hacking won’t give you. blesehy lgff kyev dnghlna vwc kma sfgvm kdibv rwmirz hda